Order to report, with nothing hidden in the middle

The five stages

1. 1

   Stage 1: You place the order

   Ten minutes of form-filling, and nothing starts until you have paid and confirmed.

   You choose a report, tell us who you are, and give us what you already know about the candidate: full name, date of birth, the addresses, the college, the employer, the details written on the biodata you were sent.

   What you give us is what we test. We are not searching for a person, we are checking whether the specific claims in front of you match official records. Vague inputs produce vague reports, so it is worth having the biodata open while you fill the form.

   You

   Enter the claims from the biodata and pay.

   We

   Confirm the order is complete enough to check, and ask you if it is not.

2. 2

   Stage 2: Consent is settled before any check runs

   Two modes. They are genuinely different, and the difference decides which checks are possible.

   This is the question every family asks and the one most providers blur. We would rather be plain about it, because the answer changes what your report can contain.

   Notified

   Candidate is asked

   The candidate is formally approached and asked to consent before a single check is run.

   • We contact the candidate, explain exactly which checks are proposed and who ordered them, and record their written consent.
   • Nothing runs until that consent is on file. If they decline, the order stops and we refund the checks that were never performed.
   • Because consent exists, the full range is available, including the checks that legally require the candidate to authorise them.
   • Families often worry this is awkward. In practice it is increasingly normal, and a candidate who agrees readily has told you something useful.

   Suits families who are already in conversation with the other side.

   Confidential

   Candidate is not contacted

   The candidate is not approached. You sign a confidentiality declaration instead, and the scope narrows accordingly.

   • You declare that you have a legitimate matrimonial reason to seek the information and that the report will be used only for that decision. That declaration is part of your file.
   • We check what can lawfully be checked without the candidate: court and litigation records, publicly available registry information, openly public profiles, and claims that can be confirmed with a source rather than with the person.
   • Checks that legally require the candidate’s own consent cannot run. Aadhaar-based identity verification, PAN verification and EPFO employment records all fall in this group. There is no workaround, and any provider offering one is not obtaining those records lawfully.
   • Your report will state plainly which checks were out of scope because of the mode you chose, so you can see the shape of what is missing rather than mistaking silence for a clean result.

   Suits an early-stage enquiry, before the families are in direct contact.

   You

   Choose notified or confidential.

   We

   Hold the order until consent is properly recorded.

3. 3

   Stage 3: We check against official sources

   Government registries, court records, university and employer confirmations, and public profiles.

   Each claim is checked against the source that actually holds the record: identity and address against government-issued records, litigation against court and case registries, degrees against the awarding university or its verification partner, employment against the employer or statutory contribution records, previous marriage against available civil and court records, and social presence against openly public profiles.

   We do not buy data from brokers, we do not use leaked databases, we do not touch dating apps, and we do not put anyone under observation. If a fact is not in an official or openly public record, it does not go in the report.

   On name matches. A record found under a similar name is not automatically the candidate. We match on corroborating details, date of birth, parentage, address history, before we attribute anything to a person.

   We

   Run only the checks your product and consent mode allow.

4. 4

   Stage 4: A named analyst reviews every finding

   No report is machine-generated and sent unread.

   Raw record matches are noisy. Common names collide, addresses are transliterated three different ways, a college changes its affiliation, a case listing names a different person entirely. An analyst reads each result, decides whether the match is real, and writes the finding in plain English.

   Where the analyst is not certain, the report says so. "Likely the same person, not confirmed" is a legitimate answer and we will give it rather than round it up to a clean verdict.

   We

   Re-check anything ambiguous before it reaches you, and name the reviewer in the report.

5. 5

   Stage 5: The report reaches you

   A PDF, plus the evidence behind every line of it.

   You get a verdict summary, one section per check with a clear status, the evidence appendix, the methodology, and the limitations that applied to your specific order. It is written to be read by someone who has never seen a background report before.

   If something in it is hard to interpret, you can add a video consultation and have an analyst walk you through it. If you want to be told about new court records appearing later, monthly monitoring covers that.

   We

   Deliver in the app and by email, and answer questions about what a finding means.

What a “no findings” report means

It means that within the checks that were run, against the sources that were reachable, in the jurisdictions we could search, nothing contradicted what you were told. That is a real and useful result. It is not the same as a promise that there is nothing to find, and we will never write it as though it were.